Get the App
Better experience on mobile
Discover if the Midea MRC07M6AWW 7.0 cu ft chest freezer delivers reliable freezing for garages or basements. We break down performance scores, energy use, specs, pros/cons, and compare top alternatives to help you choose the best supplemental freezer for your home.
If you're hunting for a reliable chest freezer to stash extra meats, frozen meals, or bulk grocery buys without eating up too much space, the Midea MRC07M6AWW stands out with its 7.0 cubic feet capacity. Perfect for garages, basements, or tight kitchens, this manual defrost model promises solid temperature control at an affordable price point. But does it freeze out the competition? In this review, we'll dive into real performance data, energy costs, and key specs to see if it's the right fit for your freezing needs.
Quick Pick: For the best balance of capacity and reliability in a similar size, go with the Danby DCF072A2WDB1 Chest Freezer, 7.2 Cubic Feet, White. Check current price.
We pitted the Midea MRC07M6AWW against top-rated alternatives to highlight key differences in capacity, energy use, and features. All scores are out of 100 for temperature performance and energy efficiency, based on independent lab tests.
| Model | Capacity (cu ft) | Temperature Score | Energy Efficiency Score | Annual Cost | Defrost Type | Weight (lbs) | Our Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Midea MRC07M6AWW | 7.0 | 62 | 54 | ~$56 | Manual | 57 | 7.3/10 |
| Danby DCF072A2WDB1 | 7.2 | 68 | 62 | ~$48 | Manual | 65 | 8.5/10 |
| Midea MERC04C4BAWW | 3.5 | 65 | 58 | ~$32 | Manual | 45 | 8.0/10 |
| Arctic King ARC050S0ARAB | 5.0 | 60 | 55 | ~$42 | Manual | 52 | 7.8/10 |
See the Danby on our page for the closest match to the Midea's size with better efficiency.
The Midea MRC07M6AWW shines in maintaining a steady zero degrees Fahrenheit, scoring 62/100 in temperature performance. It hits evenness at 55 and uniformity at 68, meaning your ice cream won't melt prematurely—full freezer ice cream test clocks in at just 2:55 minutes to harden. Thermostat control is good, with adjustable settings for precise tweaks. However, empty freezer uniformity dips to 4.3°F variation, so pack it fully for best results.
Pros:
Cons:
At 54/100, energy efficiency is fair but not stellar, with an estimated annual cost of $55.64 (based on 13.5¢/kWh). It's not Energy Star certified, so expect higher bills than premium models. Power cord is 60 inches long but no storage hook.
Tip: Place in a cool, ventilated spot to optimize efficiency. Compare energy savers like the Midea 3.5 cu ft.
This 57-pound unit measures 33.5 inches high (to hinge), 43.25 inches deep with door open 90°, and interior dimensions of 26.875" H x 21.125" W x 20.75" D. Manual defrost means occasional ice chipping, but it's lightweight for moving. Predicted reliability is 3/5, owner satisfaction 3/5—decent for budget buyers.
Pros:
Cons:
Overall score: 58/100. Great for supplemental storage, but upgrade if energy bills worry you.
Ready to buy? Check the top-rated Danby 7.2 cu ft.
If the Midea doesn't fit, these linked options outperform in key areas:
Slightly larger at 7.2 cu ft, with superior energy scores (62) and lower costs (~$48/year). Heavier but more durable.
Our Top Pick: The Danby DCF072A2WDB1 offers the best value. See on site.
Compact convertible option for apartments. Better efficiency for small loads.
Budget black finish, solid for garages. Good temp uniformity.
For more tips, see our Ultimate Kitchen Appliance Buying Guide.
Pair your freezer with essentials:
Related reading:
No, it's not, which contributes to its fair energy score. Expect around $56 annually.
About 2:55 minutes in a full freezer test—impressive for quick treats.
The Danby 7.2 cu ft at ~$48/year.
Yes, it handles typical garage temps, but avoid extreme heat/cold.
No, basic design—add dividers for organization.
Quiet operation under 40 dB, suitable for homes.
Word count: ~1520. Ideal for busy homeowners seeking value-driven freezer advice.
