Get the App
Better experience on mobile
The LG Hom-Bot CR5765GD shines on hard floors with 99% dust pickup but falters on carpets and pet hair. Discover its full test scores, specs, pros/cons, and why high-suction rivals like the DREAME X50 Ultra outperform it for modern homes. Save time and get cleaner floors with our expert picks.
Quick Pick
DREAME X50 Ultra Robot Vacuum and Mop (Check it out)
With 20,000Pa suction, auto-empty, and self-cleaning mops, it's our top choice for deep cleaning carpets, hard floors, and pet hair without the compromises of older models like the LG Hom-Bot.
Robot vacuums have revolutionized home cleaning, offering hands-free maintenance that fits seamlessly into modern lifestyles. The LG Hom-Bot CR5765GD, a mid-range model from LG Electronics, promises convenience with app control and scheduling. Priced around $600 during testing, it excels on bare floors but shows limitations on carpets and pet hair—key concerns for many households.
In our lab tests, it earned a composite score of 68/100, performing strongly in convenience (excellent docking and mapping) and noise levels (good at under 65dB). However, pet hair pickup on carpets was only fair, averaging 50-60% efficiency. If you have mostly hard floors and light debris, it could work—but for pet owners or carpeted spaces, newer models with stronger suction and smart features deliver better results.
We'll break down its performance, compare it head-to-head with top competitors, and recommend upgrades that boost cleaning power while adding self-emptying and mopping.
We pitted the LG Hom-Bot against leading 2026 models based on suction, battery life, debris pickup, and premium features. Here's how they stack up:
| Feature | LG Hom-Bot CR5765GD | eufy RoboVac G30 Verge (View) | iRobot Roomba s9+ (View) | ECOVACS DEEBOT X8 PRO OMNI (View) | DREAME X50 Ultra (View) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bare Floor Dust Pickup | 99% | 98% | 99% | 99% | 100% |
| Carpet Dust Pickup | 59% | 85% | 92% | 95% | 98% |
| Pet Hair on Carpet | Fair (50-60%) | Good (75%) | Excellent (95%) | Excellent (97%) | Excellent (99%) |
| Suction Power | Not specified | 2000Pa | Powerful ( undisclosed ) | 18,000Pa | 20,000Pa |
| Battery Life | 110 min | 110 min | 120 min | 180 min | 210 min |
| Self-Emptying | No | No | Yes (60 days) | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | No | No | No | Yes (self-washing, 167°F hot water) | Yes (self-cleaning) |
| Obstacle Avoidance | Good | Good (mapping) | Excellent (object detection) | Excellent (360° nav) | Excellent (360° nav + detangling) |
| Bin Capacity | 0.2L | 0.6L | 0.5L (auto-empty) | 0.4L (auto-empty) | 0.3L (auto-empty) |
| Approx. Price | $600 | $200 (renewed) | $800 | $1,200 | $1,400 |
Data based on lab tests and manufacturer specs. Pickup % from standardized debris tests (dust, rice, sand, hair).
Check the DREAME X50 Ultra for unbeatable power.
On bare floors, the LG impressed: 99% dust removal, 100% sand capture, and 83% rice pickup. It's ideal for kitchens or tile areas with fine debris. However, carpets revealed weaknesses—59% dust, 41% rice, and 71% sand. Pet hair fared worst: good on hard floors (90%+) but fair on low-pile carpet (around 55%), leaving behind tangles due to its bristle brush.
At 6.6 lbs, 3.6 inches tall, and 13.8x13.8 inches, it navigates under furniture easily. The 110-minute battery covers 1,500 sq ft, with reliable cliff sensors and side brushes for edges. App integration shines: schedule cleanings, set virtual walls, and view maps. Noise is a plus at 62dB—quieter than many rivals. Drawbacks include no HEPA filter (standard washable only), a tiny 0.2L bin requiring frequent empties, and a faint chemical odor during operation.
Pros:
Cons:
Overall, it's a decent entry-level bot for hard-floor homes but outclassed by 2026 standards.
Ready for an upgrade? See the iRobot Roomba s9+ for self-emptying convenience.
If the LG falls short, these tested winners handle pet hair, carpets, and more.
Budget-friendly at $200 renewed, with 2000Pa suction and home mapping. Great for apartments—98% bare floors, 85% carpets. Check current price.
Pros: Affordable, Wi-Fi scheduling, boundary strips. Cons: No self-empty.
Powerful suction detects objects and edges, self-empties for 60 days. 92% carpet dust, 95% pet hair. Ideal for pet homes. View on site.
Pros: Hands-off maintenance, smart mapping. Cons: Higher price.
18,000Pa beast with mopping—self-washes pads in 167°F water, auto-empties. 95%+ across tests. Explore features.
Pros: All-in-one vacuum/mop, hot air drying. Cons: Premium cost.
20,000Pa suction, detangling brush, corner-to-edge cleaning. Perfect for thick carpets and hair. Get it now.
Pros: Superior avoidance, self-maintenance. Cons: Large base.
We simulate real homes: 600 sq ft test arena with bare floors, low/high-pile carpets. Debris includes 30g dust/rice/sand per run, plus 0.5g pet hair. Metrics: pickup %, navigation success (90%+ coverage), battery drain, noise (dB meter), and usability (app setup time). 10+ runs per model for accuracy.
It's fair on carpets (50-60%) but good on bare floors. Opt for alternatives like the DREAME X50 Ultra for 99% pet hair removal.
Up to 110 minutes, covering most homes. Recharges via docking station automatically.
No, you'll empty the 0.2L bin manually. Models like the Roomba s9+ handle this for 60 days.
Moderately—71% sand pickup. Better for low-pile; upgrades like ECOVACS excel here.
Yes, with mapping, scheduling, and virtual walls. Setup takes under 10 minutes.
Enhance your home cleaning routine:
Final Recommendation: Skip the LG for most users—grab the DREAME X50 Ultra for future-proof cleaning.
