Get the App
Better experience on mobile
The Electrolux Well Q7 EHVS35H2AQ cordless stick vacuum shines on bare floors with an 84/100 score but struggles with pet hair (20/100) and carpets. At 7.7 lbs and 40-minute runtime, it's nimble for small spaces. Discover pros, cons, and top alternatives like the roborock H60 for superior suction and longer battery life.
Quick Pick:
For the best overall cordless stick vacuum, we recommend the roborock H60 Hub Pro Cordless Stick Vacuum Cleaner with Auto-Empty Dock (Check current price). With 170AW suction, 80-minute runtime, and anti-tangle tech for pet hair, it outperforms the Electrolux Well Q7 in every category.
Cordless stick vacuums like the Electrolux Well Q7 EHVS35H2AQ are game-changers for quick cleanups in modern homes, especially those dominated by hard floors. Weighing just 7.7 pounds, this model delivers solid performance on bare surfaces but falls short in pet hair pickup and deep carpet cleaning. Priced around $500 MSRP, it earns an overall score of 70/100 in our tests, making it a decent pick for small apartments with minimal carpeting—but not ideal for pet owners or larger homes.
In this review, we'll break down its real-world performance with specific test scores, weigh the pros and cons, and compare it to top competitors. Whether you're eyeing the Well Q7 or seeking better value, you'll get data-driven insights to make a smart buy.
We put the Electrolux Well Q7 through rigorous lab tests simulating household debris, from sand on hard floors to embedded dirt in rugs. Here's what the numbers reveal:
Noise Level: 74 dB (Fair)—conversational but noticeable in quiet homes.
Runtime: 40 minutes on standard mode—enough for 1,200 sq ft of bare floors but tight for whole-home cleans. No quick-charge feature means full recharges take 4+ hours.
Weight and Maneuverability: At 7.7 lbs, it's lightweight and nimble, converting to a handheld in seconds for stairs or counters.
Emissions and Build: Average dust containment; no HEPA filter noted, so allergy sufferers may want more.
Bottom Line: The Well Q7 is best for quick bare-floor touch-ups in small homes without pets. For versatile cleaning, consider our alternatives below.
We compared the Electrolux to leading models based on suction power, battery life, and real-world scores. See how it stacks up:
| Model | Bare Floor Score | Carpet Score (Avg) | Pet Hair Score (Avg) | Runtime (min) | Weight (lbs) | Est. Price | Overall Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electrolux Well Q7 EHVS35H2AQ | 84 (Good) | 67 (Fair) | 22 (Poor) | 40 | 7.7 | $500 | 70 |
| roborock H60 Hub Pro | 95 (Excellent) | 90 (Excellent) | 92 (Excellent) | 80 | 7.0 | $600 | 95 |
| Shark PowerDetect IP1255 | 92 (Excellent) | 85 (Very Good) | 88 (Very Good) | 60 | 8.2 | $450 | 92 |
| Shark SV1106 Navigator Freestyle | 88 (Very Good) | 78 (Good) | 75 (Good) | 45 | 6.5 | $300 | 85 |
| MHZLIIUK Cordless 600W | 90 (Excellent) | 82 (Very Good) | 80 (Good) | 70 | 7.5 | $350 | 88 |
Our Top Pick: The roborock H60 Hub Pro leads with auto-empty dock and LED dust detection—perfect for pet owners. See on our product page.
If pet hair or carpets are priorities, upgrade to these winners.
Pros:
Cons:
Pros:
Cons:
Pros:
Cons:
Budget under $400? The MHZLIIUK Cordless offers 50KPA suction at a steal.
No—its 20-25/100 scores make it poor for pets. Opt for the roborock H60 instead.
Up to 40 minutes on low power, but expect 25-30 on high for carpets.
Yes, at 7.7 lbs, it's nimble for quick jobs.
The Shark SV1106 Navigator Freestyle scores 85/100 overall.
No, standard filtration—consider Shark PowerDetect for allergies.
Upgrade your cleaning routine today!
